![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:04 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Farm animal grade
!!! UNSUPPORTED LINE BREAK IN HEADER !!!
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:11 |
|
We could only hope he’d actually do it
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:13 |
|
yes, but I do like his color choice for his Diablo
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:14 |
|
Last time Donald Trump took a risk and ran into a building without realizing the consequences of going in without experience or preparation or back up he bankrupted a casino in Atlantic City.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:15 |
|
Well the first problem is that he said run. I’m not convinced he can run or ever has.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:16 |
|
Well there and the Whitehouse.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:16 |
|
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:16 |
|
I feel like we have all been cast in the biggest reality show that ever was, and it’s sweeps week.
Every week.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:19 |
|
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:31 |
|
it’s those dang bone spurs! on one or more feet!
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:31 |
|
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:49 |
|
Or the unhealthy lifestyle and fatness.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:49 |
|
I don’t think that blob of KFC with cooking oil for blood is capable of “running” anymore.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 22:56 |
|
Irony is a cruel thing. He can’t run anywhere and he can’t run anything.
He probably couldn’t even run a bath.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 23:00 |
|
Well, he can certainly scare the living daylights out of a few billion people in the no-nuke zone of the world.
Fun fact: Mexico has ZERO US bases... which I found quite unusual.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 23:14 |
|
Probably because Mexico is so close it doesn’t need any bases in Mexico as it can, could and probably will fly over to where it needs to go.
Like Canada, it doesn’t have any bases there as such but does have services and access to Canadian bases if required.
And I should think the U.S. would have some sort of thing with Mexico whether public knowledge or not.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 23:20 |
|
I would doubt it a lot to be fair... however, if the US wanted access to Mexico there’s little actually stopping them, it’s only their stupid border fence.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 23:35 |
|
There are U.N. restrictions to violating another sovereign airspace with consequences if a valid reason isn’t given. Mexico would have every reason to shoot down such an aircraft. It would spark a diplomatic shit storm either way.
![]() 02/26/2018 at 23:37 |
|
I don’t think we have the military capacity to shoot down an American plane. If Venezuela tried to invade us we would have a fighting chance but the US?
I also think americans don’t really care about the UN, what gives!
![]() 02/26/2018 at 23:55 |
|
that may be the longest gif, I’ve ever seen
![]() 02/27/2018 at 00:00 |
|
That’s not politics. That’s fucking hilarious.
It’s like The Far Side became live action.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 00:02 |
|
They could intercept the aircraft. State they are in violation of Mexican sovereign airspace, lodge a complaint with the U.N. Security Council and could have restrictions put on it.
Countries can withdraw overflight rights if another country has violated their airspace. So Mexico could tell the U.S. that U.S. flights both military and civilian can not use it’s airspace and have to fly around Mexico.
The sovereignty of States over their airspace is still strongly expressed for flights carried out by State aircrafts that are subject to a special regime. Indeed, in its article 3 (a), the Chicago Convention expressly excludes from its scope the operation of State aircrafts flights such as aircrafts used by the custom, the police forces or the military. The same article goes on by requiring State aircrafts to obtain a special authorisation before being allowed to overfly or land in the territory of another contracting State. States aircrafts are regulated by, inter alia, the Warsaw Convention 1929, the Montreal Convention 1999, the Eurocontrol Convention, rules enacted by NATO, the Red Cross, the European Union , national legislation a number of ad hoc agreements. For damages caused by State aircrafts, the responsible State may escape liability by claiming sovereign immunity if it was acting acta iure imperi (the defence of sovereign immunity is not available if the State was acting on the same footing as private individuals). As a conclusion, it can be said that the contracting States of the Chicago Convention did not open their airspace for the free operation of States aircrafts by signing bilateral or multilateral agreements and appear to give a certain priority to the operational needs of civil aviation.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 00:02 |
|
Stay tuned for the series finale when all the nukes get launched and Earth’s biosphere is completely destroyed.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 00:13 |
|
Half truth: he is pretty good at running a country into the ground.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 00:25 |
|
There is that to.
Thing is, he’ll blame everybody else but himself.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 00:29 |
|
I’m so glad America’s institutions recognized Donald Trump for who he is before he was elected president. Just think if they had given him unlimited free exposure.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 01:43 |
|
The institutions are only as good as the people they serve, and can’t do anything when they fail.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 07:55 |
|
He has people who have people who do that for him.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 07:58 |
|
I saw the car, and thought, “how much politics can you fit in such a tiny interior?” I guess when its all bullshit; you can fit quite a lot into a tiny space.
![]() 02/27/2018 at 11:26 |
|
But like, what if they play guitar?
![]() 03/05/2018 at 11:20 |
|
don’t you mean hooves?
![]() 03/05/2018 at 16:58 |
|
um no I would never insult the cloven hooved that way